Building clean industry is not about picking the right sector. It is about lining things up.

Industrial policy is a coordination problem.

A clean factory needs four things at one place, at one time. Miss one and the bet does not convert. The hard part is the lineup, not any single ingredient.

But these four decisions sit in four different offices, and none of them sees the others.

The scarce input is coordination.

Policies rarely fail because someone picked the wrong industry. They fail because the pieces never lined up.

One screen, four silos, where the base already exists.

Mexico is already one of the great manufacturing countries. The question is never whether Mexico can industrialize. It is where clean power, capability, standards, and finance line up fast enough to turn that base into clean industrial advantage. Where. What. How.

Three plays, chosen on the data.

Ten candidates, ranked on exports, capability fit, and market size. Three made the cut: $30B auto, $42B EV, $16.8B grid. All stand on factories that exist today.

EV and Grid are a near-tie for second; Auto Supplier holds first in a thousand re-weightings.

A play card is a buildable plan, not a press release.

Each play opens into a buildable plan: products, location, standards, a six-year sequence, and a capital stack. Standards and power contracts run in parallel.

It stops being a report. It becomes a map.

Sixteen composable layers across three tabs lay capability over energy over capital. Switch them on together and the four silos sit on one surface.

Grid · EnergyIs the power there, and clean? 88.5 GW, 37% clean. Transmission and nodes, state by state.

Competitiveness · CapabilityHow close is each state? Relatedness density. The Bajio and the Northeast sit closest to the plays.

Pipeline · CapitalCapital needs an address. 431 industrial parks, colored by play fit, shaded by net-zero readiness.

All three · composedBreak the silos. Energy, capability, and capital lit at once. One number to call, not four.

Where the grid binds, and who fixes it.

The newest surface puts a price on the collision. Where new demand pays a premium, the wires are full. And every bottleneck has an owner and an action.

Constraint Maps · National

Constraint Maps · Owners

A gigawatt lands. Catalyze or cannibalize?

A hyperscale data center is, first, a gigawatt of demand competing for the grid industry needs. Planned with new clean power and wires, it catalyzes a build-out industry shares. Dropped on today's grid, it cannibalizes that headroom, met at the margin with gas. A planning decision, not physics.

Two states, two honest answers, on the next screen.

The screen: catalyze or cannibalize.

Querétaro draws roughly twice what it generates, with a data-center hub landing on the same grid its factories depend on. Set the connection mode and toggle the levers. The verdict updates live.

Live screening tool. The verdict narrative is shown in English. A screening read, not an engineering capacity study.

A readiness diagnosis, not a balance.

Nuevo León is a nearshoring engine, not a data-center case, but the grid evidence to certify it does not exist yet. Rather than a false answer, this screen names what is missing. Only the grid-evidence dial is binding.

Nuevo León is not a data-center cannibalization case. It is a nearshoring load-certification case: grid evidence is binding, not physical capacity.

Live screening tool. The diagnosis is shown in English. Growth assumptions do not change the call; grid evidence does.

What it is, and what it is not.

Precision about the limits is the point. Every result on the platform prints its limits next to it.

Nine surfaces, one platform.

Each one answers a different question, and links to the next. Start anywhere.

Two invitations.

When the four line up, you have a play. Catalyze or cannibalize is a planning decision, and now there is an accessible instrument for making it well.

Trae tu estado. Lo ponemos en una sola pantalla.